Dim Scientists Propose Spraying Sun Dimming Chemicals Into The Atmosphere

RND/ to consider the sudden, all natural dimming of Science – which, having already thoroughly, even perhaps irrevocably shit the bed enabling modern industrial society now propose hubristic fake solutions – symbolically perhaps to the underlying problem of Science itself? [1]

2445×3840 3.2MB .jpg edited in Gimp; screenshot via Googevil News

Dim Scientists Propose Spraying Sun Dimming Chemicals Into The Atmosphere

– In which one is reminded of the plot line in the anime “Animatrix” in which, having enabled the very A.I which ends up enslaving humanity, science blots out the sun trying to killing them

This could be an example of what ‘Freelance Amateur Postmodern Internet Theorist’ Robert What (/ironically) philosophically terms the dangers of H.A.I “Human Artificial Intelligence” – human intelligence which only appears smart, whose intelligence is entirely synthetic

Example Reference Links

  1. Wikipedia: Super_Omega
  2. Plato at Stanford: Philosophical Zombies
  3. Epiphenomenalism

// how to play big science

Digital Painting: Memes Aren’t Facts

RND/ to imagine a digital art panting of the once popular, seemingly self-aware / non-ironically pseudo-paradoxical “Memes Aren’t Facts” internet meme

2446×3137, 2.4MB edited in Gimp

“Memes Aren’t Facts”

Small side note to non scientific fact-based communities: please inoculate your kids immediately; stop spreading the disease of idiocy

Idiocy is not a disease but a condition in which the intellectual facilities are never manifested or have never been developed sufficiently to enable the idiot to acquire such amount of knowledge as persons of his own age reared in similar circumstances are capable of receiving
– Jean-Étienne Dominique Esquirol

Example Reference Links

  1. NY Times: How to Inoculate Against Anti-Vaxxers
  2. The Conversation: Why do you make stupid decisions when the experts tell you otherwise?
  3. Scientific American: Who Are You Calling Anti-Science?
  4. Live Science: Evolution, Climate and Vaccines: Why Americans Deny Science
  5. Willam M. Briggs: Why Memes Are Stupid: The Short Version

// how to play big science

Why Is (/Post) Modern Art So Bad? with Sad Aesthetic-Relativist Background Drowning Music

RND/ to consider the classic sodden intellectual potato “Why Is [/Post] Modern Art So Bad?” with sad drowning music

As a direct result of this tear-inducing motivational mashup, imagine internet theorist-for-hire Robert What now follows several iron laws of quality art:

// how to play big science

The 60 FPS Debate

rnd/ on scientific or fact based non debates – quick conceptual zoom in on another frayed strand of dna of derp at 60fps

part of the hypertography one exhibit

there exists cult of ignorance in united states/ always has been/ strain of anti intellectualism constant thread winding x way through ir political cultural life/ nurtured by false notion democracy means x ey ignorance just as good as ey knowledge
– isaac asimov

to consider digital conceptual research of post scientific ultra subjectivity in quote 60 fps debates – playful imaginary scenario in which fellow resarcs consider poindexter hyper nerds – salty internet sealions suddenly materializing out of digital woodwork in droves to argue flocking 60 fps toss

except such quote debates exist only virtually/ seems merely another platform andor excuse for simpson style comic book guys to split greasy micro fine non existent hairs – generally spit x sweet loose jive with abandon in elf mis-constructed post scientific desert landscapes where ultra subjectivity rules uber alles – aka ‘ey not know much – therefore scientists probably not know either’ syndrome

in which every single contested frame feels up for useless argumentative grabs by those with inflated sense of personal knowledge/ one distinct non irony such – apparently impossibly discerning visual acuity – seems utterly wasted on such hyper generic pseudo interactive digital play space experiences in which such meaningless frames display or manifest

x not even matter of carefully contextualizing such scientific facts comparing ey with private subjective experience – but too often more simply undermining shoving aside anything in scientific method which does not fit eg 60 fps pseudo debate model – form of viral wilfully elf administered mass delusional “agnotology” or unknowledge which internet appears to actively encourage / spew forth

yet to consider internet as ir – so how would x seem at all surprising

// how to play big science