RND/ to generally consider why the dr. who episode “Rosa” induces cringe in viewers: possibly that, under the benevolent christian guise of meek and mild pseudo-multiculturism, the good Doctor was simply (ideologically / symbolically) whitespaining [1] rewriting black history [2] – in short, ‘wokewashing’
“Operation Rosa Parks”.. We have to make sure we keep history [3] in [officially / culturally sanctioned] Order™
– Dr. Who on history as another mere project to be managed
KING (to Chris): How the fuck you get over here man, you look like you
educated..CHRIS: I volunteered
KING: You WHAT? Say ‘gain
CHRIS: Yeah, I dropped out of college and told ’em I wanted infantry, combat, and Nam..
CRAWFORD: You volunteered for this sh1t man?
KING: You a crazy flocker, givin’ up college man
CHRIS: Didn’t make much sense. Wasn’t learning anything.. And why should just the poor kids go to the war – and the college kids get away with it
KING: Sheeit, gotta be rich [/pale] in the first place to think like that. Everybody know the poor always being fucked by the rich. Always have, always will
– Scene from Platoon, 1986 Oliver Stone
to imagine the modern dr. who as badly written, (white) nerd fanfiction [4] cringe; a few ideas to philosophically ponder about the possible sources of its particular off smell
- take star trek, lost in space, babylon 5 [5] etc – and shove em up yer arts
- the warning ray bradbury’s classic “a delicate sound of thunder”; don’t trample over history
- h.g well’s [6] morlocks as racist symbols for ignorant black savages who don’t understand the “faith in the essential decency of the white man’s (time traveling) culture” (thanks, dr. gonzo)
- ‘historically’: sci fi as (/only for) those who self-identify as ‘white’ (“white-fi”?) [7]
- dr. who as a ‘walien’ (white alien) who acts from a privileged (seemingly more spiritually advanced and morally knowledgeable) perspective
- time seen from such a white-fi perspective; unstable, capricious, instantly accessible (understandable) and eminently hackable (and therefore automatically a-good-thing) [8]
- white-fi from a non-white perspective: exactly the same – and therefore precisely to be resisted, since such a perspective is enforced from outside (seemingly outside history); it invades, colonises and violently overwrites (sorry, delicately ‘corrects’ or helps out) black historical time, at will – without consequence
- dr. who from the perspective of trilby tipping neckbearded misogynerd fanbois; not only is dr. who a (shock horror) woman – but now also arrives with a preachy (/female!) [9] view of (oh-so-racist!) black history shoved down sore red necks *sound of tiny violin being played in lab background*
- irony gland remove detection: since the good doctor’s perspective is necessarily female and limited, wtf are nerds complaining about anyway
- what might sci fi for people of color [10] consist of – even more dr. flocking who? (associated new term: referring to cyberspace as z_ ‘interblack’)
—
Reference Links
- Whitespaining
- Reinvisioning Justice
- Herstory
- Nerd Culture
- White People Sci Fi
- H.G. Well’s Eugenics
- Hugo Awards & Sad Puppies
- Technoimperialism
- Sci-Fi womanhood
- Black Sci-Fi
// how to play big science